c950f8f3b1
5 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dejvino
|
e2e5104646 |
Take the effects off the visualizers and leave them to the grade
Forty-nine scenes carried their own `glow`, every one of the sixty-five added its own grain, and a handful had bloom, chroma, haze, smear or trail besides — all of which the post chain already does, with an envelope and a threshold no scene can see. Two uncoordinated effect layers is the smaller half of the problem. The larger half is that an effect knob sampled per song makes a scene look varied across parameter draws while its structure never moves, so the gallery and the variety harness were both being told a scene was original when only its halo had changed. Removed in three shapes. Scene grain goes entirely — the post chain owns it. Statements that ADD a falloff term scaled by the effect are bloom by another name and are deleted. What remains is an intensity on something already drawn, so the uniform is pinned to its default and the knob deleted: the picture survives, the fake variety does not. Reactive entries driving those params went too, since an effect modulated by the audio was the most convincing fake of the lot. That broke the style trait, which is the interesting part. Surface treatment had been leaving the scenes for two commits — sigGrain to post, sigEdge to inkStroke — and removing the last of it left `style` with almost nothing to express: a style+shape signature had two eligible scenes in the whole library. The trait is not obsolete, it has moved, so inkStroke and inkMask now read u_sigLine and u_sigSoft alongside the ink's own weight and edge. A scene drawing in the song's hand honours the track's line weight by construction, and the runtime probe confirms it rather than taking it on trust. This reverses a call made two commits ago for a reason that only became true now. One check needed re-aiming rather than fixing. Two independently built shows are two WebGL contexts, and engine/hash.js says at the top that bit-exactness is a same-context guarantee; the check had been demanding it anyway and getting away with it because the scenes it happened to cast were bit-stable. A casting change put smooth-gradient scenes in frame and the last bit moved. Measured before touching the check: three levels out of 255 across 2.6% of pixels, invisible. The cross-context comparison is now a distance with a ceiling of four, and bit-exactness within one show is still demanded by the check below it. 89/89 checks, 11/11 tests, all static gates. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Dejvino
|
2d3ed8eb02 |
Finish the migration: all 65 scenes on the identity artifacts
Two helpers made the bulk of it mechanical. `inkStroke` is a drop-in for
sigEdge — the same line at the identity's weight rather than the track's — and
`castForm` is a drop-in for sigForm, same signature so call sites do not change
shape. With those in place the substitution table is one-to-one:
sigForm( -> castForm( sigShape( -> castMain( sigEdge( -> inkStroke(
Forty-seven scenes went through that pass in one run: twenty-six take the cast
and the ink, twenty-one take the ink alone. Then the gate ran over all sixty-five
and found three the pass had broken, which is the entire reason it exists.
Spectrum Sculpture rendered pure black. It had been using sigShape as a RADIAL
METRIC rather than drawing it, and the cast carries notches and a hollow — an
annulus used as a radius turns a sculpture inside out. Reverted to sigShape and
dropped to ink only. The lesson generalises: a scene that reads a form as
geometry is not a scene that draws it, and the classifier cannot tell those
apart from the source.
Eclipse Field stopped honouring its `style` trait. It opts out of surface grain,
so sigEdge was its only style evidence, and the ink replaced it. The trait claim
is now dropped — and so is the lint change that had let inkMask count as style
evidence, which was wrong and was hiding exactly this. A trait is a property of
the track a scene may honour; an artifact is content it draws. Taking the ink
says nothing about whether a scene responds to u_sigLine.
Circuit Bloom went empty at the bottom of its `grown` range, where the pads were
carried by a hairline and the ink's stroke is thinner than the edge it replaced.
Now filled as well as stroked.
Also: the backtick check now covers every shader literal rather than only the
preamble, because a mechanical pass over sixty files reintroduced one
immediately. Three rounds lost to that typo is enough.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
Dejvino
|
8f5ff3a239 |
Side quest 2: give three churning scenes something to develop
Curl Flow, Signal Decay and Circuit Bloom had no parameter that changed their structure. Each was one process at one scale, statistically identical everywhere and at every moment — which is the technical statement of "it looks the same for five minutes". Every pixel moving, the image never changing. Each got the large-scale structure it was missing, and the slow axis now has something real to walk: - Curl Flow gains a CURRENT: one broad band carries the filaments and the rest runs bare. The axis is the band's strength rather than its position, and that choice was measured — moving the band preserves the frame's total energy, so a ten-second average of it is nearly the same image wherever it sits (0.0028 across a full sweep). Opening and closing it changes how much of the frame is lit at all. The current gates the final image rather than only the vein term, because the feedback trail and the flow tint each fill the frame on their own. - Signal Decay gains a DAMAGE FRONT: lock falls away on one side of a moving boundary, so the stack has a shape instead of every lane being an independent coin flip. Hiss had to be gated by it too — hiss rises as lock falls, so without that a damaged lane simply traded signal for noise and carried the same energy, and the front cancelled itself out. - Circuit Bloom now actually BLOOMS. `reach` was a fixed vignette, so the packets ran, the pads blinked and the board never changed. Its range stops at 1.6 because the frame's far corner is ~1.4 units out and travel spent past that changes nothing — the first attempt wasted most of the axis up there. The gate itself was wrong, and this is the more important half of the commit. It compared the scene at thirty seconds against the scene at two and a half minutes and divided by what it did between those points with frozen parameters. Those are two different places in the song, so the denominator was full of audio reactivity: it was really asking "does the axis move this scene MORE than the music does", which no scene should have to pass. Circuit Bloom failed at 0.92x while its mean luminance moved 5.6x across the axis — a large structural change scored as nothing. The experiment now holds time constant and varies only the axis, against a control that is the same parameters over the next window — the residual churn the ten-second average failed to cancel, which is the noise floor it has to beat. With the axis disabled the two parameter sets are identical and the ratio is 0.00 by construction, so the companion check is a real discriminator rather than a formality. It reads 0.00x on all six scenes. Moiré Grid 28.7x · Gate Corridor 14.3x · Truchet Fold 3.3x · Signal Decay 1.9x · Curl Flow 1.7x · Circuit Bloom 1.4x, against a 1.25x bar. 104/104 checks pass including the slow set. Closes SIDE-QUESTS.md §2 and the open half of EPIC-2.md §3.4. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Dejvino
|
189328587d |
Epic 2.4: a slow axis, and an honest account of what it fixes
Eleven scenes changed as much in half a second as in two minutes. The cause
was that everything moving in them was cyclic: ArcDriver's drift is a 20-70
second LFO, and an LFO returns, so ten cycles of it over five minutes is not
five minutes of anything. The eye adapts in about two seconds and then there
is nothing left to find — violently animated, and reads as static.
ArcDriver._slowAxisFor adds the missing timescale: a param that travels ONE
WAY across the whole track, keyed on the module so a scene returning in the
last section arrives further along rather than resetting. Rate params are
excluded for the reason schema.js already gives.
Two things were learned by getting them wrong first, and both are recorded
where the next person will hit them.
The first version chose the param at random from everything eligible and
measured as doing NOTHING — identical structural change with the axis applied
and with it disabled. Which param you move decides everything: sweeping Moiré
Grid's `width` moves its time-averaged structure by 0.110 and its `offset` by
0.002, and a random draw finds the second kind almost every time. So the axis
is now DECLARED, `slowAxis: true`, validated by the schema (and rejected on
rate params, where walking one would jump the animation phase).
The second is that single-frame distance cannot measure this at all. A
churning scene's consecutive frames are already ~0.6 apart, so every pair of
its frames scores the same whether the structure moved or not — the metric is
saturated by the churn it exists to see through, and the first gate passed
while the mechanism was provably inert. The gate now compares TEN-SECOND
time-averaged frames. The window was measured rather than guessed: at one
second Moiré Grid's frozen control still reads 0.024, at ten it reads 0.0095
while the signal holds at 0.037.
Per EPIC-2.md §4, the metric is verified by breaking what it should catch:
a second check runs the identical measurement with the axis disabled and
requires it to read ~1.0. It reads exactly 1.00x on all three scenes.
The honest scope, measured across ten candidates and written into EPIC-2.md
§3.4: the axis works on Moiré Grid (3.93x), Gate Corridor (2.88x) and Truchet
Fold (1.40x). Curl Flow, Signal Decay and Circuit Bloom have NO parameter that
changes their structure and still need shader work — parameter automation
cannot substitute for structure a scene does not have. Four more already
develop on their own and were never the problem. The flag is set only where it
is proven, so it means something.
69/70 on phases 3,4,7-11 slow; the one failure is the known load-dependent
Horizon Lines flake recorded in
|
||
|
Dejvino
|
2806ef1386 |
Phase 10: variety, twelve scenes, and tooling to write the next one
Watching several finished tracks side by side turned up the problem neither Phase 8 (too few cuts) nor Phase 9 (no through-line) addressed: the same scene cast in two different videos looked like the same footage twice. Section bias is nearly identical between two tracks' drops, so both sampled their parameters around the same centre, and the library's own averageness did the rest. Three answers, none of them a new scene: Temperament — a per-track hand on every parameter dial: intensity, pace, detail, and an extremity that decides how far toward the ends of a range the track is willing to sample. Bias comes from the section and is shared between tracks; temperament comes from the track and is not. Overlays — sometimes a second full scene composited over the shot, from a different family, in a blend that preserves what is underneath and never above 0.6 opacity. Not always: a stack that always doubled up would read as permanently cluttered rather than as occasionally layered. A wider palette — hue now derives from SPECTRAL TILT, the log ratio of treble to body. The centroid is a number most masters sit in the middle of, and the plain body/(body+treble) fraction is worse: low frequencies carry most of the energy in all music, so it read 0.98-1.00 for everything and four different battery tracks came out within 0.02 of each other. The ratio is multiplicative, so its logarithm is what spreads — the same four measure -9.3, -5.0, -4.1, -3.8. Also both ways round the wheel (violet, magenta and pink were unreachable by construction), four new schemes, and seeded chroma profile and lightness curve. Closest battery pair went from 0.005 to 0.113. Twelve scenes take the library to 36, six per family: Aurora Veil, Vortex Drift, Tide Rings, Ink Bleed, Dust Chamber, Salt Flat, Cargo Belt, Gate Corridor, Circuit Bloom, Truchet Fold, Signal Decay, Storm Rift. Weighted toward the 'space' and 'shape' traits, which were thinnest and so the signatures most likely to run a track out of cast — the Phase 9 casting rule means the pool a track draws from is smaller than the library. Also fixes a real one in shots.js: heavy LRU weighting was not enough to make a section reach its whole roster, and a five-shot section still came out 0,2,0,2,0 about a fifth of the time. An unseen companion now wins outright; which one is still free, so only the coverage is guaranteed. Block Mosh declared the camera trait, assigned sigCamera(p) to a p it then never read, and passed the lint's evidence grep. The Phase 9 render gate measured its response to the camera at exactly zero. --- tooling --- Adding a scene was mostly boilerplate and round-trips, which is expensive in both senses. The irreducible cost is the shader body; everything around it is now mechanical: npm run new:scene -- "Name" --family=... --traits=... writes the module, registers it, and leaves a skeleton that already passes every gate, with name-derived constants so two skeletons are not twins. The lint grew the rules that previously needed a GPU to catch: the dead camera above, prev() with no base image, and large loops with no early break (with a `// lint: fixed-cost` opt-out for a genuinely fixed-cost sampling loop). checks.html?scene=Name runs the per-scene acceptance battery for one scene — ten lines and a verdict instead of rendering the whole library to find out whether one shader is alive. The same procedure is a repo skill under .claude/skills/build-visualizer/. --- checks changed, with the measurements --- P5 determinism compared two WebGL CONTEXTS, which is not what it is for. Measured: one context is bit-exact over 40 frames with feedback at 0.6; two contexts disagree by up to 2/255 whether feedback is on or off. It now asserts generation is byte-identical (hard) and rendering within 2/255, since feedback compounds single-level variance. P10's cross-track comparison measures distance RELATIVE to how much image there is. Most scenes are mostly dark, so two genuinely different renders — 25 bars against 53 — scored under 0.02 absolute purely because the black background agrees with itself. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |